Thursday, September 29, 2016
South Australia was
asking for it, says PM Turnbull
The recent, and ongoing, severe storms in South Australia
have, of course, been accompanied by equally severe blasts of hot air from
Canberra, with PM Malcolm Turnbull, Energy Minister Josh Frydenberg, and –
curiously – independently-minded (or so I had thought) Adelaide-resident
politician Nick Xenophon being prominent wind-instruments here.
Not living in South Australia, and so not directly affected
by these twin barrages, I do not want to play the victim-in-the-eye-of-the-storm
card on their behalf. I am sympathetic,
but that’s almost beside the point, from afar. At ground zero, there are lots of emotions
going round almost randomly in these situations, which perhaps explains the straw
of blame that Nick Xenophon has chosen to cling onto. (As it happens, I also lived through an 8-hour
blackout yesterday, but that’s another, very local and minor story.)
What I’m actually angry about is thus not the (media) storm
heaped upon the (real) storm, as an ill-timed double whammy. Rather, it’s the uncanny – and obscene –
similarity between South Australia and a rape victim in all this.
The PM Turnbull (et al) line is, quite simply “She was asking for it, flaunting her svelte, low-emissions
(40% renewable) figure like a Vegas stripper.
Or like uncovered meat, if you prefer the feline analogy. In either case, under this logic South
Australia got what she deserved. That
is, a shafting by moralising puritans with their pants around their ankles, who
in their own minds rationalise their thrustings as benignly teaching her a valuable
lesson. Viz that in future, by modestly
dressing herself in a carbon-saturated sackcloth of coal-fired electricity, she
will, oh so generously and Praise the Lords of Global Warming, be spared a
repeat rape.
But does the PM Turnbull (et al) line have a slight skerrick
of scientific basis? The AEMO has,
according to two out of three ABC TV (7pm News and 7:30 Report) reports this
evening denied that there was any link between the state-wide blackout and South
Australia’s choice of electricity-generation mix (or “attire”, to continue the
analogy). The third report said that AEMO
was still investigating the cause. This hedging
and dallying is revealing – of an ugly truth.
South Australia plainly does
have a problem with its electricity, and that’s the Victorian
interconnector. The hyperbolic, if
mercifully short-lived price hike in South Australia of a few months ago, which
resulted from the Victorian interconnector being down for “maintenance” well
demonstrates the power relativities here, in both senses. I would have thought that such “maintenance”
would have been well-flagged in advance to those who would bear its brunt, so
allowing South Australia to put other contingencies in place. But perhaps I’m wrong here – and in
mid-winter, South Australia couldn’t even think about covering herself briefly
with her own non-renewable electricity, as she was too busy sashaying around to
notice the letter in her box from grim Victoria, telling her what was in store
if she didn’t get her act together.
It was, fittingly enough, protecting the Victorian interconnector (and so stopping the blackout
spreading to brown-coal lickin’, and here
actually morally-virtuous Victoria) that
seems to have been the reason that the blackout went entirely state-wide. South Australia, in “aggressively” seeking renewable
electricity, has thus found itself a lightning rod for a whole set of nasties,
worse perhaps the worst meteorological storm. In trying to be a responsible adult on this
planet, and so to mitigate climate change, South Australia has found itself to
be at the whim of a sick-puppy Victoria, playing dog in its odiferous brown-coal
manger: “So now you want our dirty electricity do ya – so beg for it, whore”.
